Race header
Hume Outlook
- Hume model estimate · built on polls, fundamentals, and markets
Side by side
3 candidates · 5 measuresPolling
2 listed · newest first| Pollster / sponsor | Field dates | Sample | Colom | Pinkins | Hyde-Smith | Others |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data for ProgressWay to Lead PAC | 2026-08-05 to 2026-08-15 | LV · n=1,018 | 41.0% | not named | 47.0% | none |
| Impact ResearchSPLC Action Fund | 2026-04-08 to 2026-04-12 | LV · n=500 | 44.0% | not named | 47.0% | none |
Seat lean · Hume PVI
- Lean (D minus R, points)
- -10.766
- Presidential cycles
- 2020, 2024
- Computed
- 2026-06-08
Hume PVI is Hidden Levers' own two-party presidential-lean index for the state, not the Cook PVI.
Prior result, this seat
2020 general
| Candidate | Party | Votes | % of total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cindy Hyde-Smith | REP | 709,511 | 54.11% |
| Mike Espy | DEM | 578,691 | 44.13% |
| Jimmy L. Edwards | LIB | 23,152 | 1.77% |
Total votes 1,311,354 · winning margin 9.98% of total (margin computed here from the cited vote counts)
Sources: FEC filings (through Sep 30, 2026 or Oct 14, 2026, by candidate) · Polls: FiveThirtyEight / VoteHub (CC BY 4.0) · Prior result: MIT Election Data + Science Lab (CC0) · Hume PVI and Hume Outlook: Hidden Levers estimates.
Federal law prohibits the sale or use of contributor information copied from FEC reports, by any person, for the purpose of soliciting contributions (including charitable contributions) or for any commercial purpose. 52 U.S.C. §30111(a)(4); 11 C.F.R. §104.15. Hidden Levers does not provide contributor contact information.